AvidXchange Holdings, Inc.

1210 AvidXchange Lane

Charlotte, NC 28206

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held at 3:00 p.m. Eastern time on Thursday, June 22, 2023

Dear Stockholders of AvidXchange Holdings, Inc.:

We cordially invite you to attend the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of AvidXchange Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“we”, the “Company” or “AvidXchange”), which will be held on Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 3:00 p.m. Eastern time at our offices located at 1210 AvidXchange Lane, Charlotte, NC, 28206, for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

You will be able to vote and ask questions during the meeting. If you need directions to the Annual Meeting so that you may attend in person, please see the “About AvidXchange” pages of our website for a map of our Charlotte, NC location or contact Investor Relations at AvidIR@icrinc.com. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting either by telephone, Internet or by proxy card to help make this meeting format as efficient as possible.

We have elected to take advantage of Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules that allow companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders by providing access to these documents on the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. Those rules allow a company to provide its stockholders with the information they need, while lowering the costs of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting. Most of our stockholders will not receive printed copies of our proxy materials unless requested, but instead will receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) on or about April 28, 2023 with instructions on how they may access and review our proxy materials on the Internet and how they may cast their vote via the Internet. If you would like to receive a printed or e-mail copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions for requesting the materials in the Notice that is being sent to you.

Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on April 24, 2023 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record on April 24, 2023 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in the accompanying proxy statement.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit your vote via the Internet, telephone or mail as soon as possible to ensure that your shares are represented. For additional instructions on voting by telephone or the Internet, please refer to your proxy card. Returning the proxy does not deprive you of your right to attend the Annual Meeting and to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder.

We appreciate your continued support of AvidXchange.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Michael Praeger

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

Charlotte, North Carolina

April 28, 2023

AVIDXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR

2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

PROCEDURAL MATTERS

This proxy statement (this “Proxy Statement”) and the enclosed form of proxy are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of AvidXchange Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “AvidXchange”), and any postponements, adjournments or continuations thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, June 22, 2023, at 3:00 p.m. Eastern time at our offices located at 1210 AvidXchange Lane, Charlotte, NC, 28206. The Notice containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our annual report is first being mailed on or about April 28, 2023 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

The information provided in the “question and answer” format below is for your convenience only and is merely a summary of the information contained in this Proxy Statement. You should read this entire Proxy Statement carefully. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement and references to our website address in this Proxy Statement are inactive textual references only.

Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

In accordance with the rules of the SEC, we have elected to furnish our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and our annual report, primarily via the Internet. The Notice containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials is first being mailed on or about April 28, 2023 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may request to receive all future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail by following the instructions contained in the Notice. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of our proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact and cost of our annual meetings of stockholders.

Will I receive any other proxy materials by mail?

No, you will not receive any other proxy materials by mail unless you request a paper copy of proxy materials. To request that a full set of the proxy materials be sent to your specified postal address or emailed to you, please follow the instructions for requesting the materials in the Notice that is being sent to you.

What matters am I voting on?

You will be voting on:

1

How does the board of directors recommend I vote on these proposals?

Our board of directors recommends a vote:

What if another matter is properly brought before the meeting?

Our board of directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment.

Who is entitled to vote?

Holders of our common stock as of the close of business on April 24, 2023, the record date for the Annual Meeting, may vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the record date, there were 201,039,253 shares of our common stock outstanding. Stockholders are not permitted to cumulate votes with respect to the election of directors. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on each proposal.

Registered Stockholders. If shares of our common stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice was provided to you directly by us. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the individuals listed on the proxy card, vote live at the Annual Meeting, or vote by proxy through the Internet or by telephone. Throughout this Proxy Statement, we refer to these registered stockholders as “stockholders of record.”

Street Name Stockholders. If shares of our common stock are held on your behalf in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered to be the beneficial owner of shares that are held in “street name,” and the Notice was forwarded to you by your broker or nominee, who is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee as to how to vote your shares. Beneficial owners are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you should follow your broker’s procedures for obtaining a legal proxy to vote your shares of our common stock live at the Annual Meeting. If you request a printed copy of our proxy materials by mail, your broker, bank or other nominee will provide a voting instruction form for you to use. Throughout this Proxy Statement, we refer to stockholders who hold their shares through a broker, bank or other nominee as “street name stockholders.”

2

How many votes are needed for approval of each proposal?

What are the effects of abstentions, withheld votes and broker non-votes?

An abstention represents a stockholder’s affirmative choice to decline to vote on a proposal. If a stockholder indicates on its proxy card that it wishes to abstain from voting its shares or withholds votes as to a particular proposal, or if a broker, bank or other nominee holding its customers’ shares of record causes abstentions or withheld votes to be recorded for shares, these shares will be considered present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Votes withheld have no effect on Proposal 1 (election of directors), as the three directors that receive the highest number of votes will be elected. Abstentions are considered votes present and entitled to vote on Proposals 2 and 3, and thus, will have the same effect as a vote “Against” such proposals. Abstentions are considered votes present and entitled to vote on Proposal 4, and thus, will have the same effect as a vote “Against” each proposed frequency set forth in Proposal 4.

A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to such proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting but will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes present and entitled to vote or votes cast. A broker has discretionary power to vote shares without instruction from the beneficial owner on routine matters, such as the

3

ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Thus, broker non-votes are not expected on that proposal. On the other hand, absent instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, a broker is not entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on non-routine matters, and as a result broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of Proposals 3 and 4. Broker non-votes on the election of directors, which is considered a non-routine matter, will have no effect because they are not considered votes cast, and the three directors that receive the highest number of votes will be elected.

As a reminder, if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, in order to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would prefer, you must provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other agent by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from your broker, bank or other agent.

What is a quorum?

A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present at the Annual Meeting to properly hold an annual meeting of stockholders and conduct business under our second amended and restated bylaws (“Bylaws”) and Delaware law. The presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the voting power of all issued and outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, there were 201,039,253 shares outstanding and entitled to vote. Thus, the holders of at least 100,519,627 shares must be present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting to have a quorum. Abstentions, withheld votes, and broker non-votes are counted as shares present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum.

How do I vote?

If you are a stockholder of record, there are four ways to vote:

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also vote by proxy so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

If you are a street name stockholder, you will receive voting instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee. You must follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee in order to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares. Street name stockholders should generally be able to vote by returning a voting instruction form, or by telephone or on the Internet. However, the availability of telephone and Internet voting will depend on the voting process of your broker, bank or other nominee. As discussed above, if you are a street name stockholder, you need to obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee in order to vote your shares in person in the Annual Meeting.

Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy any time before the Annual Meeting by:

4

If you are a street name stockholder, your broker, bank or other nominee can provide you with instructions on how to change your vote.

Will my vote be kept confidential?

Yes, your vote will be kept confidential and not disclosed to the Company unless:

What is the effect of giving a proxy?

Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our board of directors. Joel Wilhite and Ryan Stahl have been designated as proxy holders by our board of directors. When proxies are properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by such proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors as described above. If any matters not described in this Proxy Statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote the shares. If the Annual Meeting is adjourned, the proxy holders can vote the shares on the new Annual Meeting date as well, unless you have properly revoked your proxy instructions, as described above.

How are proxies solicited for the Annual Meeting?

Our board of directors is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. In addition to these proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Our directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies.

Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?

We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by our Directors, officers or employees in person or by telephone, mail, electronic transmission and/or facsimile transmission. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice?

If you receive more than one Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on each of the Notices you receive to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

5

How may my brokerage firm or other intermediary vote my shares if I fail to provide timely directions?

Brokerage firms and other intermediaries holding shares of our common stock in street name for their customers are generally required to vote such shares in the manner directed by their customers. In the absence of timely directions, your broker will have discretion to vote your shares on our sole “routine” matter: the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. Your broker will not have discretion to vote on Proposal Nos. 1, 3, and 4, as they are considered “non-routine” matters, or any other proposals that are considered “non-routine” matters, absent direction from you.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

We expect to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting. We will also disclose voting results on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days after the Annual Meeting, we will file a Current Report on Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Current Report on Form 8-K as soon as they become available.

I share an address with another stockholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials?

We have adopted a procedure called “householding,” which the SEC has approved. Under this procedure, we deliver a single copy of the Notice and, if applicable, our proxy materials to multiple stockholders who share the same address, unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of such stockholders. This procedure reduces our printing costs, mailing costs and fees. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to be able to access and receive separate proxy cards. Upon written or oral request, we will deliver promptly a separate copy of the Notice and, if applicable, our proxy materials to any stockholder at a shared address to which we delivered a single copy of any of these materials. To receive a separate copy, or, if a stockholder is receiving multiple copies, to request that we only send a single copy of the Notice and, if applicable, our proxy materials, such stockholder may contact us at:

AvidXchange Holdings, Inc.

Attention: Investor Relations

1210 AvidXchange Lane

Charlotte, NC 28206

(646) 677-1892

AvidIR@icrinc.com

We encourage stockholders to contact us by telephone or e-mail instead of physical mail to help ensure timely receipt of any request for proxy materials.

Street name stockholders may contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request information about householding.

What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?

Stockholder Proposals

Stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders by submitting their proposals in writing to our Corporate Secretary in a timely manner. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2024

6

annual meeting of stockholders, our Corporate Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices not later than the close of business on December 30, 2023. In addition, stockholder proposals must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials. Stockholder proposals should be addressed to:

AvidXchange Holdings, Inc.

Attention: Corporate Secretary

1210 AvidXchange Lane

Charlotte, NC 28206

Our Bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal before an annual meeting of stockholders but do not intend for the proposal to be included in our proxy statement. Our Bylaws provide that the only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting of stockholders is business that is (i) specified in our notice of such annual meeting, (ii) otherwise properly brought before such annual meeting by or at the direction of our board of directors or any duly authorized committee thereof or (iii) properly brought before such meeting by an eligible stockholder in accordance with the procedures set forth in our Bylaws. To be timely for the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, our Corporate Secretary must receive the written notice at our principal executive offices:

In the event that we hold the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the one-year anniversary of the Annual Meeting, then, for notice by the stockholder to be timely, it must be received by the Corporate Secretary not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting, or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made.

If an eligible stockholder who has notified us of his, her, their, or its intention to present a proposal at an annual meeting of stockholders does not appear to present his, her, their, or its proposal at such annual meeting, we are not required to present the proposal for a vote at such annual meeting.

Nomination of Director Candidates

Holders of our common stock may propose director candidates for consideration by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for membership on our board of directors and such other statements and information required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at the address of our principal executive office.

Our Bylaws also permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the information required by our Bylaws and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary in accordance with our Bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Corporate Secretary within the time periods described above under the section titled “Stockholder Proposals” for stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in a proxy statement.

Availability of Bylaws

A copy of our Bylaws is available via the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also contact our Corporate Secretary at the address set forth above for a copy of the relevant provisions of our Bylaws regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates.

7

Universal Proxy

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than April 23, 2024.

We intend to file a Proxy Statement and WHITE proxy card with the SEC in connection with the solicitation of proxies for our 2024 annual meeting. Stockholders may obtain our Proxy Statement (and any amendments and supplements thereto) and other documents as and when filed by the Company with the SEC without charge from the SEC’s website at: www.sec.gov.

8

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors. Our board of directors consists of nine directors, all of whom, other than Michael Praeger, qualify as “independent” under the listing standards of the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”). Our board of directors is divided into three staggered classes of directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the class whose term is then expiring.

The following table sets forth the names, ages as of April 24, 2023, and certain other information for each of the members of our board of directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting (who are also nominees for election as a director at the Annual Meeting) and for each of the continuing members of our board of directors:

Nominees for Director

J. Michael McGuire. Mr. McGuire has served as a member of our board of directors since October 2021. Mr. McGuire served as the Chief Executive Officer of Grant Thornton LLP, an accounting firm, from January 2015 through February 2019, and as Chief Executive Officer Emeritus from March 2019 until February 2020, when he retired. Prior to joining Grant Thornton, he led various teams for 20 years at Arthur Andersen, a former accounting firm. Mr. McGuire currently sits on the board of directors of Akoustis Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKTS), an acoustic wave technology manufacturer, and has previously served on a number of non-profit boards,

9

including those in business, universities and education, technology, arts, and community. Mr. McGuire received his BS degree in Business Administration, Accounting and Management Information Systems from Bowling Green State University and is a Certified Public Accountant. We believe Mr. McGuire is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his extensive auditing expertise with 25 years of experience as an audit partner.

Asif Ramji. Mr. Ramji has served as a member of our board of directors since December 2022. Mr. Ramji is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer at Venture Worx (a private advisory and investment firm) and previously served as the Chief Growth Officer and Chief Product Officer at FIS (NYSE: FIS) from February 2020 to May 2021. Prior to joining FIS, he led teams in an executive capacity at Worldpay (NYSE: WP), Vantiv (NYSE: VNTV), and Paymetric. Mr. Ramji currently serves on the board of directors of Cartica Acquisition Corporation, Aurora Payment Solutions, Trevipay, HungerRush, TeamSnap, Blankfactor, Tax Status, Global Claims Services and has served on the board of directors of State Bank and Trust from November 2017 to December 2018, Paymetric from October 2011 to May 2017, Patientco from October 2020 to August 2021, Stax from October 2015 to December 2017 and GiveWorx from February 2018 to June 2022. Mr. Ramji sits on several charitable and civic boards of directors, including Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Foundation and the Woodruff Alliance Theater. He was a 2017 National EY Entrepreneur of the Year for Financial Services award winner. Mr. Ramji has over 20 years of leadership experience in investing in, operating, and scaling companies. He attended Simon Fraser University as well as holds executive certifications in Managing Teams for Innovation & Success and Strategic Negotiation from Stanford University Graduate School of Business and Harvard Business School, respectively. We believe Mr. Ramji is qualified to serve on the Board due to his extensive fintech and payment solutions experience as well as his experience in operating and scaling companies.

Sonali Sambhus. Ms. Sambhus has served as a member of our board of directors since December 2022. Ms. Sambhus was head of the Developer & ML (machine learning) Platform at Block, Inc. (formerly Square, NYSE: SQ) from April 2019 to November 2022 and previously served on the Board of Directors at CommonBond.co, a fintech lending company, from April 2021 to July 2022. She has over 20 years of experience in spearheading technology strategies and innovations across diverse industries. Previously, she held executive roles at realtor.com (Nasdaq: NWSA) from January 2017 to March 2019 and Vuclip, Inc. (acquired by PCCW Limited, OTCMKTS: PCCWY) from August 2015 to July 2016. Ms. Sambhus was also the co-founder of 10jumps Inc., which was acquired by Saggezza Inc. Before 10jumps, she spent more than a decade at Cisco Systems, where she was a founding member of Cisco’s collaboration business. Ms. Sambhus received her M.S. in Computer Engineering from Rutgers University in 1999 and has earned a graduate certificate from The George Washington University School of Business. She was recognized as one of the “Top 50 Women in 2020” by The Top 100 Magazine and holds a Fintech Frameworks certification from the University of California, Berkeley. We believe Ms. Sambhus is qualified to serve on the Board due to her extensive technological experience in engineering and product development.

Continuing Directors

Lance Drummond. Mr. Drummond has served as a member of our board of directors since October 2021. Mr. Drummond is an executive-level business leader with multi-industry experience. Mr. Drummond Served as the part-time Executive-in-Residence at Christopher Newport University from September 2015 until May 2017. He retired from TD Canada Trust, a commercial bank, in January 2015, where he was Executive Vice President of Operations and Technology since 2011. Prior to joining TD Canada Trust, from 2009 to 2011, Mr. Drummond was Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Shared Services at Fiserv, Inc., a global fintech and payments company, where he oversaw the company’s shared services, including Fiserv’s Global Services employees in India and Costa Rica. Before joining Fiserv, Mr. Drummond was the Global Consumer and Small Business Banking eCommerce/ATM executive at Bank of America. Prior to his eCommerce/ATM role, he was the Service and Fulfillment Operations executive for Global Technology and Operations. Mr. Drummond sits on several boards of directors, including serving as a member of the Board of Governors of the Financial Industry Regulatory Agency (FINRA) and Chair of the Audit Committee, a member of the board of directors at the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) and Chair of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, and a member of the board of directors of United Community Banks, Inc. (NASDAQ: UCBI) and Chair of the Nominations and Governance Committee. Mr. Drummond earned a BS degree in Business Management from

10

Boston University, an MBA degree from the Simon Business School at the University of Rochester, and an MS degree in Management Science from MIT. We believe Mr. Drummond is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his extensive experience in the operations and technology space and public company board experience.

Matthew Harris. Mr. Harris has served as a member of our board of directors since July 2015. Mr. Harris joined Bain Capital Ventures in September 2012 to lead the New York City office, where he currently serves as a Partner. Mr. Harris focuses on business services companies, with a particular interest in financial services. Mr. Harris has served as a member of the board of directors of Flywire Corporation (NASDAQ: FLYW), a global payments enablement and software company, since January 2015. He was previously a member of the board of directors of BTRS Holdings Inc. (f/k/a Factor Systems, Inc. (d/b/a Billtrust)) (NASDAQ: BTRS), a provider of cloud-based software and integrated payment processing solutions, until December 2022. Prior to joining Bain Capital Ventures, Mr. Harris founded Village Ventures, Inc., an early-stage venture capital firm focused on the media and financial services sectors, and served as Managing Director from January 2000 to September 2012. Mr. Harris received a BA degree in Political Economy from Williams College. We believe Mr. Harris is qualified to sit on our board of directors due to his extensive experience as an investor and board member of a variety of fintech companies.

James (Jim) Hausman. Mr. Hausman has served as a member of our board of directors since July 2002. Mr. Hausman previously served as our Interim Chief Financial Officer from April 2014 to June 2015. Mr. Hausman is a Certified Public Accountant and has 18 years of experience as the chief financial officer for a public, and several private, telecommunications companies. Mr. Hausman began his career at Price Waterhouse, which later became PricewaterhouseCoopers. He has a BS degree in Accounting from the University of Kentucky. We believe Mr. Hausman is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his extensive experience as chief financial officer of a public company, and due to his extensive knowledge of our Company.

Teresa Mackintosh. Ms. Mackintosh has served as a member of our board of directors since October 2021. Ms. Mackintosh has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Trintech, a computer software company, since February 2016, and has more than 25 years of experience in the accounting, tax and finance functions of global companies. Prior to joining Trintech, Ms. Mackintosh served as Chief Executive Officer of Wolters Kluwer Tax and Accounting US from October 2013 to January 2016. Ms. Mackintosh received a BBA degree and an MBA from the University of Michigan and is a former Certified Public Accountant. We believe Ms. Mackintosh is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to her experience as an executive officer and her experience serving in oversight roles for accounting and software companies.

Wendy Murdock. Ms. Murdock has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2019. Ms. Murdock has over 30 years of experience as a manager and director in the global financial services industry. Ms. Murdock served as the Chief Product Officer of Mastercard Worldwide from 2005 to 2009, where she was responsible for innovation, development, go-to-market strategy and commercialization of all Mastercard products targeted at consumers, corporations/governments, and merchants. She subsequently served from 2009 to 2012 as Mastercard Worldwide’s Chief Payment Systems Integrity Officer with responsibility for leading the company’s anti-fraud, information, and cyber security programs. Ms. Murdock serves as a member of the board of directors of Iron Mountain Incorporated (NYSE: IRM), a storage and information management services company, and previously served from 2013 to 2016 on the board of Recall Holdings Limited (a public unlisted company), a digital and physical information management services company. She has also served as a member of the board of directors for USAA Federal Savings Bank since December 2013 and USAA Savings Bank since April 2016. Since 2016, Ms. Murdock has served on the board of La Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, a large institutional pension fund, acting as Chair of the Governance and Ethics Committee since 2020. Ms. Murdock received a BA degree in French Canadian Studies from McGill University and an MBA degree from the University of Western Ontario. We believe Ms. Murdock is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to her extensive experience as a senior finance executive, including as the chief product officer of one of the world’s largest financial services companies.

11

Michael Praeger. Mr. Praeger is cofounder of AvidXchange and has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as Chairman of our board of directors since April 2000. Mr. Praeger also served as our President from December 2010 to January 2023. Mr. Praeger has spent the last 28 years managing technology and web services-related companies. Prior to establishing AvidXchange, Mr. Praeger co-founded PlanetResume.com, a technology career enhancement and recruiting site that successfully completed its merger with CareerShop.com in November 1999. Prior to that, Mr. Praeger co-founded and served as Chief Executive Officer of InfoLink Partners, a software company specializing in automating the tax billing and collection functions for municipalities along with corporate escheat recovery services. Mr. Praeger received a BSBA degree in Finance from Georgetown University. We believe Mr. Praeger is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his extensive knowledge of our Company, as well as his significant operational and strategic expertise.

Composition of Our Board of Directors

The primary responsibilities of our board of directors are to provide oversight, strategic guidance, counseling and direction to our management. Our board of directors meets on a regular basis and on an ad hoc basis as required. Our board of directors currently consists of nine directors. Our restated certificate of incorporation provides that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution approved by a majority of our board of directors. In accordance with our restated certificate of incorporation, our board of directors is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms are expiring will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following his or her election and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, in accordance with our restated certificate of incorporation. Our directors are divided among the three classes as follows:

Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of the directors.

The board of directors recognizes that the division of our board of directors into three classes with staggered three-year terms may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control of our Company. The board of directors also recognizes and maintains that responses to unsolicited offers must account for the Company’s status as a regulated and licensed money transmitter with significant cash resources on its balance sheet. In light of these significant cash resources, the board of directors believes that the class structure with its staggered three-year terms assists the board of directors in protecting the interests of the Company’s shareholders in the event of an unsolicited offer for the Company. Because of the additional time required to effectuate a change in control of the board, the board of directors believes that our class structure encourages dialogue and discourages interest from potential parties who may place more value on the Company’s cash assets than its business model or operations.

Director Independence

Under the listing requirements and rules of Nasdaq, independent directors must comprise a majority of our board of directors as a listed company. In addition, the rules of Nasdaq require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, human capital and compensation and corporate governance and nominating committees be independent. Audit committee members and human capital and compensation

12

committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 and Rule 10C-1, respectively, under the Exchange Act. Under the rules of Nasdaq, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director with that listed company.

To be considered to be independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3 and under the rules of Nasdaq, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of directors, or any other board of directors committee: (1) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

To be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10C-1 and under the rules of Nasdaq, the board of directors must affirmatively determine that each member of the human capital and compensation committee is independent, including a consideration of all factors specifically relevant to determining whether the director has a relationship to the company which is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a human capital and compensation committee member, including, but not limited to: (i) the source of compensation of such director, including any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee paid by the company to such director; and (ii) whether such director is affiliated with the company, a subsidiary of the company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the company.

Our board of directors has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each director. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships and stock ownership, our board of directors has determined that each of Messrs. Drummond, Harris, Hausman, McGuire, and Ramji and Mses. Mackintosh, Murdock, and Sambhus do not have any relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing requirements and rules of Nasdaq. Mr. Praeger is not independent under Nasdaq’s independence standards.

In making these determinations, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our Company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director, and the transactions involving them described in the section titled “Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions.” There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Board Leadership Structure

The board of directors has no set policy with respect to the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Currently, Mr. Praeger serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Harris serves as our lead independent director. The board of directors believes that this overall structure of a Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, combined with a lead independent director, results in an effective balancing of responsibilities, experience and independent perspectives that meets the current corporate governance needs and oversight responsibilities of the board of directors.

A number of factors support the leadership structure chosen by the Board, including, among others, Mr. Praeger’s extensive knowledge of all aspects of the Company and its business, its risks, its industry, and its customers. This knowledge enables Mr. Praeger to effectively elevate the most critical business issues for consideration by our board of directors. In turn, Mr. Praeger’s combined role is counterbalanced and enhanced by the oversight and independence of our board of directors and the leadership provided by our lead independent director and independent committee chairs.

13

As lead independent director, Mr. Harris presides over executive sessions of our independent directors and serves as a liaison between our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board and our independent directors. He also performs such additional duties as our board of directors may otherwise determine and delegate. In addition, each of our board committees is comprised of independent directors that provide strong independent leadership for each of these committees. Our independent directors generally meet in executive session after each regular meeting of the board of directors. At each such meeting, the presiding director for each executive session of our board of directors is an independent or non-employee director. Our board of directors will continue to evaluate this leadership structure on an ongoing basis based on factors such as the experience of the applicable individuals and the current business environment.

Board Meetings and Committees

Our board of directors may establish the authorized number of directors from time to time by resolution. Our board of directors currently consists of nine members.

During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, our board of directors held five meetings, and each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of our board of directors held during the period for which he or she had been a director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our board of directors on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served.

Although our corporate governance guidelines do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our board of directors at annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend. Those who do attend are expected to answer appropriate questions from stockholders. All nine of our directors attended our 2022 annual meeting.

Our board of directors has established an Audit Committee, a Human Capital and Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and a Risk Management Committee. The composition and responsibilities of each of the committees of our board of directors are described below. Each committee of our board of directors has a written charter approved by our board of directors. Copies of each charter are posted in the investor relations portion of our website at www.avidxchange.com. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained at or available or accessible through our website, and you should not consider it to be a part of this Proxy Statement. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our board of directors. Our board of directors may establish other committees as it deems necessary or appropriate from time to time.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Hausman and McGuire and Mses. Mackintosh, Murdock, and Sambhus. Our board of directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the independence requirements under Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act. The chairperson of our Audit Committee is Mr. Hausman. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Hausman is an “Audit Committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations. Each member of our Audit Committee can read and understand fundamental financial statements in accordance with applicable requirements. In arriving at these determinations, our board of directors has examined each Audit Committee member’s scope of experience and the nature of their employment.

The primary purpose of our Audit Committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our board of directors with respect to our corporate accounting and financial reporting processes, systems of internal control and financial statement audits, and to oversee our independent registered public accounting firm. Specific responsibilities of our Audit Committee include, among other things:

14

Our Audit Committee reviews, discusses and assesses its own performance and composition at least annually. Our Audit Committee also periodically reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter, including its role and responsibilities as outlined in its charter, and recommends any proposed changes to our board of directors for its consideration and approval.

Our Audit Committee held eight meetings during fiscal year 2022.

Human Capital and Compensation Committee

Our Human Capital and Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Drummond, Harris, McGuire, and Ramji and Mses. Mackintosh and Sambhus. The chairperson of our Human Capital and Compensation Committee is Mr. McGuire. Our board of directors has determined that each member of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee is independent under the listing standards of Nasdaq and a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

The primary purpose of our Human Capital and Compensation Committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our board of directors in overseeing our compensation policies, plans and programs and to review and determine the compensation to be paid to our executive officers, directors and other senior management, as appropriate. Specific responsibilities of our Human Capital and Compensation Committee include, among other things:

15

Under its charter, our Human Capital and Compensation Committee may form, and delegate authority to, subcommittees as appropriate. Our Human Capital and Compensation Committee reviews, discusses and assesses its own performance and composition at least annually. Our Human Capital and Compensation Committee also periodically reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter, including its role and responsibilities as outlined in its charter, and recommends any proposed changes to our board of directors for its consideration and approval.

Our Human Capital and Compensation Committee held five meetings during fiscal year 2022.

Human Capital and Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures

Typically, our Human Capital and Compensation Committee meets at least quarterly and with greater frequency if necessary. The agenda for each meeting is usually developed by the chairperson of our Human Capital and Compensation Committee, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer. Our Human Capital and Compensation Committee meets regularly in executive session. From time to time, various members of management and other employees as well as outside advisors or consultants may be invited by our Human Capital and Compensation Committee to make presentations, to provide financial or other background information or advice or to otherwise participate in Human Capital and Compensation Committee meetings. The Chief Executive Officer may not participate in, or be present during, any deliberations or determinations of our Human Capital and Compensation Committee regarding his compensation or individual performance objectives. The charter of our Human Capital and Compensation Committee grants our Human Capital and Compensation Committee full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company. In addition, under the charter, our Human Capital and Compensation Committee has the authority to obtain, at the expense of the Company, advice and assistance from compensation consultants and internal and external legal, accounting or other advisors and other external resources that our Human Capital and Compensation Committee considers necessary or appropriate in the performance of its duties. Our Human Capital and Compensation Committee has direct responsibility for the oversight of the work of any consultants or advisers engaged for the purpose of advising our Human Capital and Compensation Committee. In particular, our Human Capital and Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain, in its sole discretion, compensation consultants to assist in its evaluation of executive and director compensation, including the authority to approve the consultant’s reasonable fees and other retention terms. Under the charter, our Human Capital and Compensation Committee may select, or receive advice from, a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser to our Human Capital and Compensation Committee, other than in-house legal counsel and certain other types of advisers, only after taking into consideration six factors, prescribed by the SEC and Nasdaq, that bear upon the adviser’s independence; however, there is no requirement that any adviser be independent.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Messrs. Harris, Hausman, and McGuire and Ms. Mackintosh. The chairperson of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is Mr. Harris. Our board of directors has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent under the listing standards of Nasdaq.

Specific responsibilities of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include, among other things:

16

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews, discusses and assesses the performance of our board of directors and its committees. In fulfilling this responsibility, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks input from senior management, our board of directors and others. In assessing our board of directors, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates the overall composition of our board of directors, our board of directors’ contribution as a whole and its effectiveness in serving our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews, discusses and assesses its own performance and composition at least annually. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also periodically reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter, including its role and responsibilities as outlined in its charter, and recommends any proposed changes to our board of directors for its consideration and approval.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during fiscal year 2022.

Risk Management Committee

Our Risk Management Committee consists of Messrs. Drummond, Hausman, and Ramji and Ms. Murdock. The chairperson of our Risk Management Committee is Mr. Drummond. Our board of directors has determined that each member of the Risk Management Committee is independent under the listing standards of Nasdaq and SEC rules and regulations.

Specific responsibilities of our Risk Management Committee include, among other things:

Our Risk Management Committee held three meetings during fiscal year 2022.

Human Capital and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of our Human Capital and Compensation Committee, which committee consists of Messrs. Drummond, Harris, McGuire, and Ramji and Mses. Mackintosh and Sambhus, is or has been an officer or employee of the Company. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past fiscal year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other board of directors committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or Human Capital and Compensation Committee.

Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying, reviewing, evaluating and recommending candidates for nomination to our board of directors, including candidates to fill any vacancies that may occur. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the qualifications of candidates in light of the policies and principles in our corporate governance guidelines and may also engage third party search firms to identify director candidates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may conduct

17

interviews, require the completion of detailed questionnaires and conduct comprehensive background checks or use any other means that it deems appropriate to gather information to evaluate potential candidates. Based on the results of the evaluation process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends candidates to the board of directors for approval as director nominees for election to the board of directors.

Holders of our common stock may propose director candidates for consideration by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for membership on our board of directors and such other statements and information required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at the address of our principal executive office. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates director nominees recommended by holders of our common stock using the same evaluation process as used for any other candidate.

Our Bylaws also permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the information required by our Bylaws and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary in accordance with our Bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Corporate Secretary within the time periods described above under the section titled “Stockholder Proposals” for stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in a proxy statement.

Minimum Qualifications

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including being able to read and understand basic financial statements, being over 21 years of age and having the highest personal integrity and ethics. Some of the specific qualifications that our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider include, but are not limited to, such candidate’s (i) level of expertise, (ii) potential conflicts of interests or other commitments, (iii) demonstrated excellence in his or her field, (iv) ability to exercise sound business judgment, (v) diversity with respect to personal background, perspective and experience, (vi) experience as a board member or executive officer of another publicly held company, and (vii) commitment to rigorously representing the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also reviews director candidates in the context of the current size and composition of our board of directors, the operating requirements of the Company and the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers a broad range of backgrounds and experiences and may consider factors including gender, racial diversity, age, skills, and such other factors as it deems appropriate to maintain an appropriate balance of knowledge, experience and capability.

Our board of directors values diversity as a factor in selecting nominees, and is committed to ensuring that qualified women and racially/ethnically diverse candidates are included in the pool from which any new independent director nominee is chosen. In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews such directors’ overall service to the Company during their term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance, and any other relationships and transactions that might impair such directors’ independence. In the case of new director candidates, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also determines whether the nominee is independent for purposes of Nasdaq listing rules.

18

Creating a More Diverse and Inclusive Community; Making an Impact

Having a diverse and inclusive organization is core to who we are. As of April 2023, 49% of our employee team members were women and 38% were members of an underrepresented community. Our leadership team, consisting of director-level employees and above, likewise reflects our commitment to diversity, with 35% of our leadership team being women and 24% of our leadership team being members of an underrepresented community. The following chart provides the diversity statistics for our board of directors in accordance with Nasdaq Rule 5606, as self-disclosed by our directors.

Stockholder and Other Interested Party Communications

Our board of directors provides to every stockholder and any other interested party the ability to communicate with the board of directors as a whole, and with individual directors on the board of directors, through an established process for stockholder communication. For a communication directed to the board of directors as a whole, stockholders and other interested parties may send such communication to our Corporate Secretary at AvidXchange Holdings, Inc., 1210 AvidXchange Lane, Charlotte, NC 28206, Attn: Board of Directors c/o Corporate Secretary.

For a stockholder or other interested party communication directed to an individual director in his or her capacity as a member of the board of directors, stockholders and other interested parties may send such communication to the attention of the individual director at AvidXchange Holdings, Inc., 1210 AvidXchange Lane, Charlotte, NC 28206, Attn: Name of Director.

Our Corporate Secretary, in consultation with appropriate members of our board of directors as necessary, will review all incoming communications and, if appropriate, all such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member or members of our board of directors, or if none is specified, to our Chairman of the Board.

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines that address items such as the qualifications and responsibilities of our directors and director candidates and corporate governance policies and standards applicable to us in general. In addition, our board of directors has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions. Our code of business

19

conduct and ethics is available under the “Investor Relations––Corporate Governance” section of our website at ir.avidxchange.com/corporate-governance/documents-charters. In addition, we intend to post on our website all disclosures that are required by law or the listing standards of Nasdaq concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the code. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained in or available or accessible through our website, and you should not consider it to be a part of this Proxy Statement.

Risk Management

Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks the Company faces, while our board of directors, as a whole and assisted by its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, our board of directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are appropriate and functioning as designed.

Our board of directors is responsible for risk oversight. Our board of directors believes that it is essential for effective risk management and oversight that there be open communication between management and our board of directors. Our board of directors meets with our Chief Executive Officer and other members of the senior management team at quarterly meetings of our board of directors, where, among other topics, they discuss strategy and risks facing the Company, as well as at such other times as they deem appropriate.

Our Audit Committee assists our board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk management in the areas of internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures, and legal and regulatory compliance, and discusses with management and the independent auditor guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. Our Audit Committee also reviews our major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control these exposures. Our Audit Committee also monitors certain key risks on a regular basis throughout the fiscal year, such as risk associated with internal control over financial reporting and liquidity risk. Our Human Capital and Compensation Committee assesses risks created by the incentives inherent in our compensation policies. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists our board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risk associated with board organization, membership and structure, and corporate governance.

Our Risk Management Committee assists our board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to identifying, evaluating, and mitigating strategic, operational, and external risks, including, but not limited to, operational, financial, cybersecurity, and information technology risk exposures and the steps taken by management to monitor and control these expousres. Our full board of directors also reviews strategic and operational risk in the context of reports from the management team, receives reports on all significant committee activities at regular meetings of our board of directors, and evaluates the risks inherent in significant transactions.

Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging Transactions

Our insider trading policy prohibits any director, employee (including our executive officers) or consultant to our Company from, among other things, engaging in short sales, transactions in put or call options, hedging transactions, margin accounts, or other inherently speculative transactions with respect to our common stock at any time. Our directors, employees (including our executive officers), and consultants are also not permitted to pledge our securities as collateral for a loan.

Non-Employee Director Compensation

Compensation Philosophy

The outside director compensation program is intended to provide a total compensation package that enables us to attract and retain qualified and experienced individuals to serve as directors and to align our directors’ interests

20

with those of our stockholders. Employee directors receive no additional compensation for their service as a director. Each independent director is entitled to reimbursement of all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred for their attendance at meetings of our board of directors or any committee thereof.

The non-employee director compensation program consists of two components—cash retainers and annual equity compensation.

Cash Compensation

Prior to 2022, we generally did not provide our non-employee directors, in their capacities as such, with any cash compensation. We have, from time to time prior to our initial public offering, made equity awards to certain of our non-employee directors. Commencing in January 2022, each of our non-employee directors became eligible to receive annual retainers for board and committee service as follows:

All annual cash compensation amounts are payable in equal quarterly installments in arrears, following the end of each quarter in which the service occurred, pro-rated for any partial months of service.

Equity Compensation

In addition to cash retainers, our non-employee directors are eligible for equity compensation pursuant to our non-employee director compensation program, as described below.

Initial Grant

Our non-employee director compensation policy provides that each new non-employee director who joins our board of directors will receive a RSU award for common stock having a value of $175,000 based on the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant under our 2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”), with the $175,000 being prorated based on the number of months from the date of appointment until the next annual meeting of our stockholders. Each initial grant will vest on the earlier of (i) the date of the following annual meeting of our stockholders (or the date immediately prior to the next annual meeting of our stockholders if the non-employee director’s service as a director ends at such meeting due to the director’s failure to be re-elected or the director not standing for re-election) or (ii) the one year anniversary measured from the date of grant, each subject to continued service as a director through each applicable vesting date.

Annual Grant

On the date of each annual meeting of our stockholders, each continuing non-employee director will automatically receive a RSU award for common stock having a value of $175,000 based on the fair market value

21

of the underlying common stock on the date of grant under our 2021 Plan. Each annual grant will vest on the earlier of (i) the date of the following annual meeting of our stockholders (or the date immediately prior to the next annual meeting of our stockholders if the non-employee director’s service as a director ends at such meeting due to the director’s failure to be re-elected or the director not standing for re-election) or (ii) the one year anniversary measured from the date of grant, each subject to continued service as a director through each applicable vesting date.

The calculation of the number of shares of RSUs granted under the non-employee director compensation policy will be based on a 10 trading-day average of the closing price of our common stock as reported by Nasdaq with the tenth day being the trading day immediately prior to the date of grant.

Vesting Acceleration

In the event of a change in control (as defined in our 2021 Plan), any unvested portion of an equity award granted under the policy will fully vest immediately prior to the closing of such change of control, subject to the non-employee director’s continuous service with us on the effective date of the change of control.

Compensation Philosophy

The non-employee director compensation program is intended to provide a total compensation package that enables us to attract and retain qualified and experienced individuals to serve as directors and to align our directors’ interests with those of our stockholders. Employee directors receive no additional compensation for their service as a director. All of our independent directors are entitled to reimbursement of all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred for their attendance at meetings of our board of directors or any committee thereof.

Non-Employee Director Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the total compensation that was earned by each of our non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2022. Mr. Praeger, our Chief Executive Officer, is also the Chairman of our board of directors, but did not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director. Mr. Praeger’s compensation as a named executive officer is presented in “Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table” below.

22

The table below shows the aggregate number of shares subject to stock and option awards (vested and unvested) held as of December 31, 2022, by each of our non-employee directors serving on our board of directors as of December 31, 2022:

23

PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our board of directors is currently composed of nine members. In accordance with our restated certificate of incorporation, our board of directors is divided into three staggered classes of directors. At the Annual Meeting, three Class II directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring.

Each director’s term continues until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal. Any increase or decrease in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of our directors. This classification of our board of directors may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in the control of our Company.

Nominees

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended, and our board of directors has approved, Messrs. McGuire and Ramji and Ms. Sambhus as nominees for election as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting. If elected, each of Messrs. McGuire and Ramji and Ms. Sambhus will serve as Class II directors until the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Each of the nominees is currently a director of our Company. For information concerning the nominees, please see the section titled “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance.”

If you are a stockholder of record and you sign your proxy card or vote by telephone or over the Internet but do not give instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares will be voted “FOR ALL” in connection with the election of each of Messrs. McGuire and Ramji and Ms. Sambhus. We expect that Messrs. McGuire and Ramji and Ms. Sambhus will each accept such nomination; however, in the event that a director nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee designated by our board of directors to fill such vacancy. If you are a street name stockholder and you do not give voting instructions to your broker or nominee, your broker will leave your shares unvoted on this matter, which will result in no effect on the vote for this matter.

Director Interest

Messrs. McGuire and Ramji and Ms. Sambhus have an interest in this Proposal No. 1, as each is currently a member of our board of directors.

Vote Required

The election of directors requires a plurality of the voting power of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. Broker non-votes and votes withheld will have no effect on this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR ALL”

OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

24

PROPOSAL NO. 2

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, PwC served as our independent registered public accounting firm.

Notwithstanding the appointment of PwC, and even if our stockholders ratify the appointment, our Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during our fiscal year if our Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of our Company and our stockholders. At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. Our Audit Committee is submitting the appointment of PwC to our stockholders because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate governance. Representatives of PwC will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders.

If our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of PwC, our board of directors may reconsider the appointment.

Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered to our Company by PwC for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Auditor Independence

In our fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, there were no other professional services provided by PwC, other than those listed above, that would have required our Audit Committee to consider their compatibility with maintaining the independence of PwC.

25

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

Our Audit Committee at least annually reviews and provides general pre-approval for the services that may be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. The term of the general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of approval, unless our Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period. If our Audit Committee has not provided general pre-approval, then the type of service requires specific pre-approval by our Audit Committee.

Pursuant to its charter, our Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more Audit Committee members so long as any such pre-approval decisions are presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. All services performed and related fees billed by PwC during fiscal year 2022 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee pursuant to regulations of the SEC.

Vote Required

The ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2023 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the votes cast affirmatively or negatively at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions are considered votes present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus, will have the same effect as a vote “Against” this proposal. Because brokers have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification of the appointment of PwC, we do not expect any broker non-votes in connection with this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”

THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE

FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2023.

26

PROPOSAL NO. 3

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing stockholders with an opportunity to make a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. The compensation of our named executive officers is disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and narrative discussion, and the other related disclosures. This non-binding advisory vote is commonly referred to as a “say on pay” vote. This “say on pay” vote is our first since the completion of our initial public offering, and we are soliciting a non-binding advisory vote in Proposal No. 4 with respect to when the next “say on pay” vote will occur.

Stockholders are urged to read the “Executive Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement, which discusses how our executive compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy and contains tabular information and narrative discussion about the compensation of our named executive officers. Our Human Capital and Compensation Committee and our board of directors believe that these policies and procedures are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and in achieving our goals.

As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding. However, our board of directors and Human Capital and Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive compensation program, value the opinions expressed by stockholders in their vote on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.

Vote Required

This non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers will be determined by a majority of the votes cast for or against this proposal. Abstentions are considered votes present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus, will have the same effect as a vote “Against” this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”

THE APPROVAL, ON A NON-BINDING ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE

COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

27

PROPOSAL NO. 4

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY STOCKHOLDER VOTES

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders with an opportunity to make a non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of future non-binding advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. This non-binding advisory vote must be submitted to stockholders at least once every six years.

Stockholders can indicate whether they would prefer a non-binding advisory vote every year, every two years, or every three years. Our board of directors believes that future non-binding advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers be held every year so that stockholders may express annually their views on our executive compensation program, philosophy, policies, and practices.

Our board of directors and the Human Capital and Compensation Committee value the opinions that stockholders will express in their vote on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of holding future non-binding advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. Nonetheless, this vote is advisory and, therefore, not binding on our board of directors or the Company, our board of directors may decide that it is in the best interests of the stockholders that the Company hold an advisory vote on our executive compensation more or less frequently than the option preferred by the stockholders. The vote will not be construed to create or imply any change or addition to the fiduciary duties of the Company or the board of directors.

Vote Required

The non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory stockholder votes—whether every one year, two years, or three years—that receives the affirmative support of a majority of the votes cast will be deemed to be the frequency preferred by the stockholders. Abstentions are considered votes present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus, will have the same effect as a vote “Against” each proposed frequency. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. If no option receives votes from the holders of a majority of the shares cast, no preference of our stockholders will have been approved by our stockholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE, ON A

NON-BINDING ADVISORY BASIS, TO HOLD FUTURE

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTES ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS EVERY “ONE YEAR.”

28

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee is a committee of the Board of Directors comprised solely of independent directors as required by the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC and the rules and regulations of the SEC.

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee has:

Based on the Audit Committee’s review and discussions with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 for filing with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:

AUDIT COMMITTEE

James Hausman, Chairperson

J. Michael McGuire

Teresa Mackintosh

Wendy Murdock

Sonali Sambhus

This report of the Audit Committee is required by the SEC and, in accordance with the SEC’s rules, will not be deemed to be part of or incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and will not otherwise be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

29

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table identifies certain information about our executive officers as of April 24, 2023. Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, our board of directors and hold office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Executive Officers

Michael Praeger. Please see the section titled “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance – Continuing Directors” above for Mr. Praeger’s biography.

Daniel Drees. Mr. Drees joined us in April 2018 and has served as our President since January 25, 2023, having previously served as our Chief Growth Officer. Mr. Drees is a seasoned financial technology executive and industry veteran with more than 25 years of experience generating growth at Fortune 500 companies and financial institutions such as General Electric Company (NYSE: GE), Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), Ally Financial Inc. (NYSE: ALLY), and Capital One (NYSE: COF). Most recently, he led the fraud and risk solutions business at Fiserv, Inc. (NASDAQ: FISV) from July 2017 through March 2018, where he focused on enabling financial institutions and their clients to reduce the cost and complexity associated with fraud and compliance through process automation and data analytics. Mr. Drees received his BS degree in Mechanical Engineering from Iowa State University.

Joel Wilhite. Mr. Wilhite joined us in February 2017 as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Wilhite brings decades of diverse financial leadership experience to his role. Before joining us, Mr. Wilhite held the position of Chief Financial Officer at Quantros, Inc., a SaaS company that offers an enterprise-wide suite of applications designed to help hospitals better manage the quality and safety of patient care. Prior to Quantros, Inc., Mr. Wilhite was the Senior Vice President of Finance for Benefitfocus.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: BNFT), a leading SaaS provider of benefits administration software and solutions. Prior to Benefitfocus, Mr. Wilhite served in various roles at Blackbaud, Inc. (NASDAQ: BLKB), most recently as the Chief Financial Officer for Blackbaud, Inc.’s international division. Mr. Wilhite began his career as an auditor at KPMG. He received his BS degree with honors in Accounting from the University of South Carolina and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Angelic Gibson. Ms. Gibson joined us in October 2019 as our Chief Information Officer. Ms. Gibson has spent over 20 years in information technology, with experience in building and managing SaaS platforms, enterprise technology systems, as well as management practices supporting databases, networks, telecommunications, and infrastructure. She has built and supported business intelligence platforms, has extensive cloud computing strategic insight, and has experience balancing operational efficiencies with business development and growth. Before joining us, Ms. Gibson served as Senior Vice President of Information Technology at TKXS Inc. from April 2013 to October 2018. Ms. Gibson received her BS degree in Management Information Systems from American InterContinental University.

Todd Cunningham. Mr. Cunningham joined us in August 2014 and has served as our Chief People Officer since March 2020, having previously served as Senior Vice President of Human Capital and Talent Management.

30

Mr. Cunningham has more than 26 years in Human Resources at public and private companies. His experience covers the full range of Human Resources responsibilities. Before joining us, Mr. Cunningham held senior positions at Bank of America focusing on talent management, development, and organizational effectiveness, where he served in various capacities, including: Senior Vice President of Talent & Development Executive, Global Corporate & Investment Banking; Vice President of Associate Readiness Change Executive — Merrill Lynch Transition; and Senior Vice President of Talent & Development Executive, Consumer & Small Business Banking Division, among others. Mr. Cunningham received a BSBA degree in Human Resources Management from The Ohio State University.

Ryan Stahl. Mr. Stahl joined us in May 2015 and has served as our General Counsel and Secretary since November 2017. Mr. Stahl began his legal career in the corporate and securities practice at Sidley Austin, LLP, focusing primarily on mergers and acquisitions and capital markets offerings. He subsequently held multiple in-house corporate positions in the financial services and technology industries, most recently at Mercury Payment Systems Inc., a privately-held payment processor and technology services provider. Mr. Stahl holds a BS degree from the University of Dayton and a JD degree from the University of Michigan Law School.

31

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) explains the design of our executive compensation program practices and objectives as well as the compensation paid to our named executive officer (“NEOs”). Our NEOs for fiscal 2022 are:

Notes:

Executive Compensation Objectives

The primary objectives of our executive compensation program are to attract, motivate, and retain leaders who have a growth mindset as well as the skills and experience required to maximize shareholder value. We believe that our executive compensation program aligns the interests of our executives and their compensation to the short and long-term goals of AvidXchange by creating a pay-for-performance environment. Rewards are enhanced by the completion of specific, measurable goals with final pay decisions approved in the context of both company and individual performance.

We seek to develop our executive compensation program by understanding the competitive landscape within our peer group and among broader labor competitors in the software and fintech spaces.

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee regularly reviews our executive compensation program to ensure it is consistent with the strategic direction of the Company and our values. Additionally, we strive to employ best practices with the regular assessment of our policies and practices.

Strengthening Long-Term and Strategic Performance

As we continue to navigate through a volatile financial climate, we remain focused on our cultural DNA through teammate engagement as well as delighting our customers with new enhancements and offerings. During fiscal 2022 we were named a “Great Place to Work” which reflects our continued efforts toward positive teammate engagement by creating a healthy and inclusive organization for all teammates. Other examples of our efforts to consistently improve the health of our organization include:

32

2022 Compensation Highlights

Our executive compensation program is designed to align the executive team to building long-term stakeholder value by balancing both stable and at-risk compensation. The charts below reflect this balance within the target pay mix of our CEO and the average pay mix of our other NEOs for fiscal year 2022.

33

Executive Compensation Policies and Practices

34

ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION

Role of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee

All compensation arrangements with our NEOs are overseen and approved by our Human Capital and Compensation Committee. On an annual basis the committee:

Role of the Compensation Consultant

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant to provide advice and guidance. In fiscal year 2022, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee retained Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”) as its independent compensation consultant. Compensia provides data and advice on our executive compensation strategy, compensation peer group, market data and pay practices, board of director compensation, proxy advisor preferences, pay for performance alignment, incentive plan design, and our annual compensation risk assessment. Compensia only provided services to the Company that were requested and approved by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee in fiscal year 2022. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Compensia pursuant to SEC and Nasdaq rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists or existed during fiscal year 2022 that would prevent Compensia from independently advising the Human Capital and Compensation Committee.

Management’s Role in the Executive Compensation Process

The CEO and key members of the internal Talent and Legal functions support the Human Capital and Compensation Committee’s executive compensation process and frequently attend portions of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee’s meetings. In conjunction with the executive compensation process, the CEO provides his perspective to the Human Capital and Compensation Committee regarding performance of the executive leadership team. Additionally, the executive leadership team also provides feedback on their executive direct reports. The CEO and members of the internal Talent team work together and present recommendations to the Human Capital and Compensation Committee on all elements of executive compensation. The CEO is not present for deliberations or decisions by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee regarding his compensation.

35

Factors Considered in Setting Pay

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee takes into consideration a number of factors when setting pay for each NEO. Factors considered include but are not limited to review of market data, existing equity retention hold, prior compensation actions, qualitative factors including Company and individual performance, individual scope and impact of role, tenure, internal pay parity comparison and affordability of cash and equity components relative to budget. There is no set formula or ratio when comparing compensation between executive officers.

Compensation Peer Group

On an annual basis, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee reviews and approves a peer group of similarly situated companies. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee reviews potential comparators based on a range of factors including public reporting status, company location, stage and time from IPO, industry (with focus on fintech and SaaS companies), identified labor competitors and comparability on financial and valuation metrics including revenue, revenue growth and market capitalization.    

The fiscal year 2022 peer group was established to include:

Compensation data for this peer group is considered along with other data when setting pay for our NEOs.

36

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

The primary elements of our executive compensation program include Base Salary, Annual Incentive Program, and Long-Term Incentive (Equity) Program and are summarized below.

Summary of Key Elements of Fiscal 2022 Compensation

Below is a table that contains the key elements of our fiscal 2022 executive compensation program:

Base Salary

Base salary is intended to provide a stable level of cash compensation that is aligned to an executive’s experience, responsibilities, qualifications, and performance. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee reviews base salaries on an annual basis with the objective to attract and retain key talent by comparing current base salary levels to market. Base salary increases are not guaranteed unless specified by an employment agreement and are driven by both market-practice and executive performance. We believe that having market-competitive base salaries creates a foundation for consistent, everyday management of our business.

The fiscal 2022 base salaries outcomes for each executive were a result of the review and approval of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee with input from Compensia, our Talent team, and our CEO (for decisions other than for the CEO).

37

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee reviewed the market data for comparable positions within our peer group as well as the performance of our CEO, Mr. Praeger, in executive session and determined to increase his base salary by 3.1%, from $485,000 to $500,000 for 2022. This action was taken to align Mr. Praeger’s base salary at just above the peer market median and is commensurate with his sustained performance as the CEO. Our other NEOs received an average base salary increase 12.6%.

Salary increases for NEOs other than the CEO reflect review of peer market ranges and other factors referenced above. The increase for Mr. Stahl was incremental in recognition of the increased scope and complexity of his role for the organization becoming a public company.

Annual Incentive Plan

For fiscal year 2022, the executive Annual Incentive Plan was a cash-based bonus opportunity comprised of pre-set objective and rigorous financial metrics (55% weighting), specific pre-set business and corporate initiatives (25% weighting), and individual performance (20% weighting). Threshold performance of 90% of target was required for a minimum payout for each financial metric. Payouts are capped at 200% of target tied to significant above-target performance.

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee determines eligibility, payout levels and performance targets on an annual basis in the first quarter. For all NEOs, payouts under this plan are considered “at-risk” and are not guaranteed. In the first quarter immediately following the performance year, plan performance achievement is certified by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee. We believe that our Annual Incentive Plan is an effective way to motivate executives to achieve near-term business results that will have a direct impact on our long-term business strategy.

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee reviews and approves target annual incentive opportunities based on review of peer group market data and other factors referenced above. The targets of our NEOs may be adjusted from time to time depending on strategic priorities, market movement or changes to an executive’s role.

In fiscal year 2022, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee reviewed and approved a change to Mr. Praeger’s annual incentive opportunity based on a review of peer market data and other factors.

38

Mr. Praeger’s target was changed from 85% to 100% of base salary. Ms. Gibson and Mr. Stahl each had their annual bonus plan target increase by 10% from 50% to 60% and from 40% to 50%, respectively. The target for Mr. Wilhite was increased by 5% from 65% to 70%, and Mr. Drees’ target remained the same as the previous year at 40%. The table below outlines the target opportunities for all of our NEOs:

Notes:

Sales Incentive Compensation Plan for Dan Drees

For fiscal 2022, Mr. Drees’ role was that of Chief Growth Officer. His compensation in that role included a sales incentive opportunity with a target of 60% of his base salary ($237,000). The performance measures associated with this plan were sales volume for buyer customers (65%) and supplier customers (35%). There was no change to his incentive opportunity at target for this plan from 2021 to 2022.

39

Award Determination

The goals for each fiscal year are reviewed and approved during the first fiscal quarter by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee. As previously outlined, payouts for our NEOs are earned based on financial, business and strategic initiatives, and individual performance objectives. The breakdown of how an executive’s annual incentive payout is determined is shown below:

Annual Incentive Plan Fiscal Year 2022 Performance

The financial outcomes of fiscal year 2022 were strong – Revenue (30% weighting) performance was 103% of target while operating margin (25% weighting) performance was 166% of target. The resulting payout percentage of target was 115% and 200% (capped at maximum), respectively.

For purposes of the Annual Incentive Plan:

40

For fiscal year 2022, the Annual Incentive Plan included certain strategic initiatives at both the corporate and business unit levels that were designed to drive alignment on key priorities across the Company. These initiatives were aimed at growth, innovation, product development, customer care and teammate engagement. Examples of such initiatives include strengthening pay platform effectiveness through implementation of critical enhancements and improving customer experience, implementing specific initiatives and integrations for both buyers and suppliers, delivering technology roadmaps for key products and partnerships, and achieving teammate hiring and engagement plans.

We view these initiatives as foundational in building long-term stakeholder value. While no single initiative is materially impactful to the overall outcomes within the plan, in aggregate, performance against this component comprises 20% of the weighting toward the calculation of payouts.

Factors that weighed into the achievement of Mr. Praeger’s bonus achievement score focused on management of key external constituents, increasing perfomance of and accountability for results among the executive leadership team, driving the Company’s long-term strategy, developing best-in-class approaches to executing on corporate development plans and growing the next generation of leadership for the Company.

For each of the other NEOs, their bonus achievement was based on a set of factors specific to each individual NEO which were designed to drive growth and effectiveness within their area of accountability and to incent the creation of high performing organizations to drive the long-term success of the business as a whole.

41

Based on the Annual Incentive Plan outcomes described above, the payouts to our NEOs for fiscal year 2022 were as follows:

Notes:

The payout for Mr. Drees’ sales incentive compensation was as follows:

Long-Term Incentive Plan

We believe long-term incentives are an important element of compensation that connects an executive’s motivations to sustained value creation of the Company. The Company utilizes Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) and stock options to make awards to our executives. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee reviews the equity award mix on an annual basis and may make changes as it deems appropriate.

42

Our equity awards are designed to create significant opportunity for share ownership. The exact sizing of awards is determined by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee with consideration for: impact to share pool reserve, executive position, market data, internal equity, strategic importance of position, individual performance as well as the individual potential of an executive.

The targeted equity award mix for fiscal year 2022 was 70% RSUs and 30% stock options for our executives. We grant RSUs as we see them as a durable motivator, especially in an environment where macroeconomic factors may have a strong influence on a company’s share price despite strong company performance compared to expectations. We believe that stock options are inherently performance-based as the executive only realizes value if shareholders also realize value through share price appreciation.

The chart below shows the equity awards made to our NEOs during fiscal year 2022. The target dollar values may vary from the Summary Compensation Table values as the values in the Summary Compensation Table are calculated based on disclosure standards.

Notes:

43

Other Compensation

Retirement Benefits

We currently maintain a 401(k) retirement savings plan for our employees, including our named executive officers, who satisfy certain eligibility requirements. Under the 401(k) plan, eligible employees may elect to reduce their current compensation by up to the prescribed annual limit, and contribute these amounts to the 401(k) plan. For fiscal year 2022, we provided matching contributions under our 401(k) Plan representing 100% of the first 3%, and 50% of the next 2%, of an employee’s 401(k) plan elective deferrals.

Our named executive officers did not participate in, or otherwise receive any benefits under any pension or retirement plan sponsored by us during fiscal year 2022.

Deferred Compensation

We have a deferred compensation plan available for the benefit of officers and employees who qualify for inclusion. The plan is described below in connection with the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.

Supplemental Benefits and Perquisites

We provide limited supplemental benefits and perquisites to our NEOs not offered to the general employee population. We provide a reimbursement of financial and tax planning services on an annual basis to our executives.

Other Benefits and Reimbursements

Mr. Wilhite, our Chief Financial Officer, receives a $2,395 per month housing and travel reimbursement from the Company. This amount is grossed-up for taxes when paid to Mr. Wilhite.

Clawback Policy

The Company’s board of directors has adopted a clawback policy contained in our 2021 LTI Plan document for all equity plan participants, which gives the Human Capital and Compensation Committee discretion to require the recission of an award held by, or the repayment partially or in full of an award distributed to, equity plan participants whom the Human Capital and Compensation Committee determines have benefited from materially inaccurate financial statements. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee believes that this clawback policy helps reduce the potential for excessive risk taking by Company executives.

We are reviewing the final clawback rule adopted by the SEC that implements the applicable provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the NASDAQ’s related proposed listing standard, in each case relating to recoupment of incentive-based compensation. We will implement its clawback policy in accordance with the new listing standard when the new listing standard becomes final.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies

Under our insider trading policy, all employees and members of the board of directors are prohibited from engaging in any hedging transactions with respect to any equity securities of the Company held by them. This includes monetization transactions (including but not limited to zero-cost collars, prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, puts, calls, collars, forwards and other derivative instruments) designed to hedge any decrease in market value of such equity securities. The Company’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits all employees of the Company and members of the board of directors from pledging the Company’s securities as collateral for a loan.

44

Tax Deductibility of Compensation

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) disallows a tax deduction to publicly held companies for compensation paid to certain executive officers to the extent that compensation exceeded $1 million per officer. While the Human Capital and Compensation Committee considers the benefit of deducting compensation, it believes that stakeholders’ interests are best served if discretion is used to provide flexibility in determining compensation levels, even if a portion of the compensation may result in a non-deductible compensation expense. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee intends to continue its practice of using discretion in determining compensation levels of executive officers with consideration for the best interests of stakeholders even if some portion of such compensation is non-deductible.

Human Capital and Compensation Committee Report

The information contained in the following Human Capital and Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference in such filing.

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based upon such review and discussions, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Submitted by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:

HUMAN CAPITAL AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

J. Michael McGuire, Chairperson

Lance Drummond

Matthew Harris

Teresa Mackintosh

Asif Ramji

Sonali Sambhus

45

Summary Compensation Table

The table below reflects our NEO compensation for fiscal year 2022, 2021, and 2020.

Notes:

46

All Other Compensation Table

Notes:

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The table below reflects all plan-based awards granted to our NEOs during fiscal year 2022.

47

Notes:

48

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The table below reflects information regarding stock awards and stock options held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2022.

49